Policy
|
Ruling
|
Date
|
Headmin
|
Naming Policy
|
Click here for the policy. Generally enforced at admin discretion.
|
Aug 02, 2017 - Dec 18, 2018
|
Ausops
|
Drones building autocloners
|
Fine unless done to interfere with other players.
|
Sep 08, 2017
|
Ausops
|
Hunting the nuclear operative shuttle
|
Do not attack the nuclear operative shuttle unless you follow an operative there or are led there by the pinpointer. Ruling struck down due to changes to the nuclear operative shuttle.
|
Sep 16, 2018 - Apr 01, 2020
|
Arianya
|
Suiciding at round start as a Wizard to end the round
|
Any instances of wizards killing themselves roundstart will be met with a permanent jobban from the role.
This no longer ends the round due to dynamic.
|
Oct 27, 2018
|
Nervere
|
Naming Policy - Updated
|
Click here for the policy. Generally enforced at admin discretion.
|
Dec 18, 2018 - Oct 25, 2020
|
Nervere
|
Using any language other than English in-game
|
While we warmly welcome and eagerly invite players from all around the world to participate in the /tg/ community, we require everyone to communicate exclusively in English when playing on our servers. This restriction applies to both IC and OOC methods of communication.
|
Mar 25, 2020 - Nov 11, 2021
|
Phuzzylodgik
|
Blood Contracts
|
Shouldn't be used by non-antags to kill at random.
Removed from the game.
|
Sep 20, 2020
|
Coconutwarrior97
|
Arresting nonantagonists on station vs team antagonist game modes
|
By station vs team antagonist game modes, the author of the thread meant nuke ops, blob, wizard, malf, etc. Security is still allowed to arrest nonantagonists for crimes on these game modes. That's part of their job.
This thread was based on the assumption that nuke ops, blob, etc confirm that there is no other antagonists. This was true at the time, but is no longer true after Dynamic.
|
Jul 30, 2014
|
Ikkarus
|
Streaming
|
We've talked it over and we've decided that we will be disallowing streaming in its entirety from our server. It creates too many administrative headaches and potential for abuse to be allowed, while providing little benefit in return. If we add special restrictions and rules to streaming we'd need admins to check in and make sure those restrictions are being followed (such as a delay) when they're already busy trying to administrate on the server in the first place. The exception to all of this is that during certain special events such as the charity toolbox event or the balls we may lift this restriction.
|
Apr 21, 2019
|
Hulkamania
|
Make Shoe-less Clowns Valid
|
Shoeless clowns have been specifically encouraged via code changes to allow them to wear appropriate clothing for dress up shenanigans. No longer do they have a negative moodlet for being without their shoes. A clown is supposed to dress up to their hearts content, limiting that by making them valid without the shoes is rather punishing.
This was more relevant at the time, when shoeless clowns were assumed valid, but that assumption is long gone, and taking off your shoes as clown even gives a positive moodlet now.
|
Aug 21, 2019
|
Hulkamania
|
Families Betrayal/Grief
|
If you choose to betray your family, the actual betrayal can only happen once you've joined another family. This avoids the issue of having team antags killing each other and justifying it as betrayal. Families are expected to operate similarly to revs in regards to the more widespread damage they cause, so blowing up the SM for no reason is likely not going to be alright because it could kill some of your own family members or interfere with their work, if however you bomb a rival family's headquarters that is probably alright.
With PR #68480, the Families gamemode has been removed.
|
Mar 18, 2020 - Jul 17, 2022
|
Coconutwarrior97
|
Thieves Policy
|
Like abductors, obsessed, and brainwashed victims, thieves are not full antagonists and therefore rule 4 does not apply to them. Security should treat thieves as they would any other crew member who is maliciously stealing items. Likewise, thieves should not be using murder as a first resort to get items, and should escalate regularly.
With PR #69304, the Thieves gamemode has been removed.
|
Feb 21, 2022 - Aug 19, 2022
|
Dragomagol
|
Make "Do not state this law" a valid silicon policy law
|
No, for the variety of reasons that have been said in this thread.
|
Aug 25, 2019
|
Wubli
|
If a borg linked to a rogue AI is emagged then does the emagged laws or AI law zero take priority?
|
Very niche case and is probably impossible since emags should sever the connection to the AI. Starmute made a good post on AI law priority if you are confused.
|
Are AI laws applied retroactively?
|
No. You'll have to read this thread to understand it, the question doesn't really provide enough context.
|
Apr 04, 2016
|
Hornygranny
|
Tyrant module discussion
|
Just general discussion on the tyrant lawset.
|
Do purged silicons have to act like a crewmember?
|
Purged silicons are subject to rule one and standard escalation.
|
Dec 22, 2014
|
Stickymayhem
|
Discussion on paladin lawset: Part 2, the electric boogaloo
|
Most relevant post is by HotelBravoLima, which applies to law interpretation in general. "Even doing something consistent with an interpretation of laws isn't good if you're being an OOC dick about it to such an extreme, that's the policy."
|
May 02, 2015
|
HotelBravoLima
|
Law interpretation and do not state this law clauses
|
There is room for interpretation in some cases. Be consistent in your interpretation of the laws.
|
Aug 22, 2017
|
Ausops
|
Purging AIs for no reason
|
Purging should be used in cases where you are making new lawsets, are doing something as an antagonist, etc, and should not be a get out of jail free card on needing to make a lawset. We are officially recognizing purging as a means for players to achieve this effect as metagaming.
|
Apr 6, 2022
|
Mothblocks
|
Letting people in to upload laws
|
If the person has a right to be there, such as captain/RD, then you must let them in unless they've harmed people in the past or have announced intentions to upload harmful laws.
|
Apr 14, 2017
|
Armhulenn
|
Asimov and gang dominators
|
This can probably be applied to other nonharmful antagonist objectives. If a human orders you not to destroy it, don't destroy it. Other than that, Asimov does not forbid you from destroying it.
|
Feb 27, 2016
|
Ausops
|
AIs shutting security down because of law one (discussion)
|
This is already covered in silicon policy. Here's the discussion thread on it.
|
Jan, 2016
|
Is mindswap considered harm?
|
No, but if an Asimov silicon has mindswap and is ordered not to use it by a human, it can't use it. This is kind of an edge case.
|
Nov 15, 2015
|
Jordie0608
|
Security Cyborg Policies
|
Just a few random questions related to security cyborgs. If a cyborg is acting as security/releasing prisoners then this is probably relevant as well. Link to answers.
|
Nov 26, 2014
|
Pandarsenic
|