Headmin Rulings: различия между версиями
imported>Capn monkeypaw Нет описания правки |
imported>Capn monkeypaw Нет описания правки |
||
Строка 164: | Строка 164: | ||
|Coconutwarrior97 | |Coconutwarrior97 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''' | |'''Using any language other than English in-game''' | ||
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=26061#p551359 While we warmly welcome and eagerly invite players from all around the world to participate in the /tg/ community, we require everyone to communicate exclusively in English when playing on our servers. This restriction applies to both IC and OOC methods of communication.] | |[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=26061#p551359 While we warmly welcome and eagerly invite players from all around the world to participate in the /tg/ community, we require everyone to communicate exclusively in English when playing on our servers. This restriction applies to both IC and OOC methods of communication.] | ||
|Phuzzylodgik | |Phuzzylodgik |
Версия от 14:42, 25 марта 2020
Note: This page is moderated and can be referenced in OOC issues, such as ban appeals, complaints, reports, etc. This may not apply to the pages this page links to. |
This is a compilation of headmin rulings on various policy questions asked by players. This page does not replace the rules and whenever possible the rules should be referred to instead of this page. The rulings listed here can be referenced in ban appeals and admin complaints.
Please note: Some of these questions are for very niche/specific situations. Some of them cannot be applied the same way to every situation.
General Rulings
Security Rulings
Silicon and Drone Related Rulings
Do AIs need a definition of Syndicate agent? | No, they know by default what a Syndicate agent is. This also applies to other antagonists. | Hornygranny |
Do wizards mindswapped into a silicon have to follow laws? | Yes, they do. If you have laws then you must follow them unless you have a law zero. (When in doubt, adminhelp it.) | Ikarrus |
Do silicons count as a being under drone laws? | Yes, treat them as any other crew member. | QuartzCrystal |
Can you order force-borged cyborgs to pick a certain module? | Yes. | Scaredy/An0n3 |
Detonating cyborgs with little reason/alternatives | Don't do it. | Ikarrus |
Security Cyborg Policies | Just a few random questions related to security cyborgs. If a cyborg is acting as security/releasing prisoners then this is probably relevant as well. Link to answers. | Pandarsenic |
Do purged silicons have to act like a crewmember? | Purged silicons are subject to rule one and standard escalation. | Stickymayhem |
Silicons and harm in situations where you can't tell if they're being harmed or not. | Use common sense to decide if harm is going on. | |
Drones and the shuttle | Drones have no reason to be on the shuttle and probably shouldn't be there. | It's unlikely this will be enforced and it's possibly not even a rule anymore. |
AIs asking for law changes | An Asimov silicon cannot ask their laws to be changed. | HotelBravoLima |
Discussion on paladin lawset | No real headmin rulings took place here, this is mainly opinions/discussion about what the laws in the paladin lawset mean. Most relevant is Cheridan's post. | Cheridan |
Discussion on paladin lawset: Part 2, the electric boogaloo | Most relevant post is by HotelBravoLima, which applies to law interpretation in general. "Even doing something consistent with an interpretation of laws isn't good if you're being an OOC dick about it to such an extreme, that's the policy." | HotelBravoLima |
Drone Policy Guidelines | Guide to drone policy. | Stickymayhem |
Are augmented humans still human? | Yes, they are. There's a helpful chart in silicon policy to help explain this, reference that and adminhelp if there's still a question. | Scones |
Tyrant module discussion | Just general discussion on the tyrant lawset. | |
Drones and atmospherics | Improving atmos is okay. Cutting pipes/turning off plasma is not okay. Fighting the symptoms of plasma in the distro is fine though. | Shadowlight213 |
Spacing brains, MMIs, and intellicards | You can always do it as an antagonist, you should have a very good reason as a nonantagonist. | Dorsidwarf/Ausops |
Cyborgs alerting the crew they're about to be emagged | You can tell the crew you are about to be emagged, but once you have traitor laws, you must follow them. | |
AIs shutting security down because of law one (discussion) | This is already covered in silicon policy. Here's the discussion thread on it. | |
Is mindswap considered harm? | No, but if an Asimov silicon has mindswap and is ordered not to use it by a human, it can't use it. This is kind of an edge case. | Jordie0608 |
Holoparasites and Asimov | Holoparasites aren't human- a cyborg can attack the holoparasite but not the human. If the parasite recalls and the human is in critical, the borg must give him medical attention. | KorPhaeron and Shadowlight213 |
AI's law zero | The law zero that a traitor AI gets means that it is an antagonist and it can ignore all other laws. | KorPhaeron |
Is slipping human harm? | Only if the object they're holding falls on them and causes brute damage. | Ausops |
If a borg linked to a rogue AI is emagged then does the emagged laws or AI law zero take priority? | Very niche case and is probably impossible since emags should sever the connection to the AI. Starmute made a good post on AI law priority if you are confused. | |
Are AI laws applied retroactively? | No. You'll have to read this thread to understand it, the question doesn't really provide enough context. | Hornygranny |
Silicons and Fight Clubs | It's considered self harm if they're willingly fighting. Silicons shouldn't interfere if it's self harm. If they're being forced to fight, it's human harm and silicons should intervene. | Thunder12345/Agreed with by headmins |
Roboticists making unslaved borgs for no reason | Link to relevant thread. The discussion derailed into code discussion but the ruling is that roboticists cannot make unslaved borgs for no reason. | |
Asimov and gang dominators | This can probably be applied to other nonharmful antagonist objectives. If a human orders you not to destroy it, don't destroy it. Other than that, Asimov does not forbid you from destroying it. | Ausops |
Drones and permabrig | You can go in to fix damage. You might still get dronebanned if you let people out, it will likely be handled case-by-case. | |
Additional discussion on what drones can and can't do | Linked here. | |
Asimov and Corpses | Corpses aren't human. You can't space them for no reason though. | Shaps/Lzimann |
Do caks remember past lives? | Yes. Not really silicon policy but it's related to MMIs/borging. | KorPhaeron |
Calling silicons rogue for little/no reason | Against the rules, don't do it. | TehSteveo/KorPhaeron |
AI suiciding to prevent subversion | Context: If an AI knows it will be subverted and cause human harm, can it suicide? Example, clock cultists breaking into core, desword traitor in upload about to subvert, etc. It's allowed. He says it should be bannable not to, but you won't get banned for not doing so, it's up to the player. | KorPhaeron |
Asking to be deconstructed and then outing person who emagged you as an emagged borg | Don't do it. | PKPenguin321 |
Potential Law One Violations | "Prioritizing "potential future law violations" is a fucking terrible idea, since it makes silicons able to handwave basically any law two request with "yeah but if i let you in there you might potentially attack somebody inside, law 1 violation!!!"" | PKPenguin321 |
Silicons and Prisoners | If a nonharmful prisoner asks to be released, it can be released. If a harmful one asks to be released, don't release him unless security is harming him. In all cases release prisoners being harmed by security. (assuming all prisoners are human and you are asimov) | PKPenguin321 |
Letting people in to upload laws | If the person has a right to be there, such as captain/RD, then you must let them in unless they've harmed people in the past or have announced intentions to upload harmful laws. | Armhulenn |
Are drones valid? | Only if they do something to annoy you. Mass killing drones for no reason is not okay. | KorPhaeron |
Drones building autocloners | Fine unless done to interfere with other players. | Ausops |
Drones and Powersinks | Drones cannot destroy powersinks under the same logic of them not being able to defuse bombs or stop plasma floods. | Ausops |
Laws ordering silicons to kill themselves | Whether silicons have to follow it depends on wording of law. You must have a good reason as a nonantagonist and you're free to do it as an antagonist. | Ausops |
Law interpretation and do not state this law clauses | There is room for interpretation in some cases. Be consistent in your interpretation of the laws. | Ausops |
Silicons using leet speak | Silicons are not allowed to leet speak (e.g. l33t sp34k), but typing in a 'glitchy' manner is allowed on roleplay grounds | Hulkamania |
Make "Do not state this law" a valid silicon policy law | No, for the variety of reasons that have been said in this thread. | Wubli |
Is chaplain with dark blessing human? | Chaplain with a dark blade is human. It's a fancy arm add on. We don't make people silicon for having augments, even full ones. | Hulkamania |
MRP Rulings
Murderboning Specifics on Manuel | Some roles can do it, some cant, and there are grey areas. | Coconutwarrior97 |